主隊追平還是要管出局數的，因為說不定繼續打會超前

所以如果上一局的狀況主隊領先，就不該判定平手讓主隊吃虧


規則本來就有可能有寫不清楚的地方，之前的判例當然可能是照規則來解讀的

但是不代表規則就沒有問題

像是這是MLB rule book裡面的寫的

7.02(b)(4)

(A)

 If one team is ahead, the team that is ahead shall be declared the winner
(unless the game is called while an inning is in progress and before the
inning is completed, and the visiting team has scored one or more runs to
take the lead, and the home team has not retaken the lead, in which case the
score upon the completion of the last full inning shall stand for purposes of
this Rule 7.02(b)(4); or

後面符合今天的條件，客隊得分超前，主隊沒有反超，所以回溯上局

但是這則的前提是分數不是平手，沒有講到主隊追成平手的情況

(B)
 If the score is tied, the game shall be declared a “tie game” (unless the
game is called while an inning is in progress and before the inning is
completed, and the visiting team has scored one or more runs to tie the game,
and the home team has not retied the game, in which case the score upon the
completion of the last full inning shall stand for purposes of this Rule
7.02(b)(4)


前提是如果當下分數平手，但是後面寫除非客隊追平，然後主隊沒有重新追平?

這樣不就前後矛盾?

所以這一場比賽的狀況在MLB的規則也判不出來?

提出來只是想討論規則本身是否完整，不是要爭規則這樣寫所以怎麼判


補上前文

7.02(b)(4)

Any suspended game that has progressed far enough Rule 7.02(a)(9) to
7.02(b)(4) 91 to become a regulation game, but which has not been completed
prior to the last scheduled game between the two teams during the
championship season shall become a called game, as follows:

如果延賽到球季兩隊最後一次對戰結束時還沒完成補賽的話會裁定


MLB還是有和局的，只是很少遇到

2016年小熊和海盜就有因雨裁定和局

https://www.espn.com/mlb/game/_/gameId/360929123


B的但書就是在說

"裁定當下兩隊平手，判為和局，除非"

"發生當時一局正在進行中但是還沒結束"

"客隊得分追平"

"主隊沒有重新追平"  <--配合前面幾點來看我覺得是沒有重新超前，不然這句話不合理

如果是以"重新超前"的情況來看就是我說的狀況2-2，只有追平所以回溯前一局

※ 編輯: jim1029 (1.169.243.30 臺灣), 05/24/2023 01:31:45

--