---

雖然我覺得網路閱讀很速食，
評價寫出來大家不會想仔細看跟想，
但還是寫一下看看吧，我盡量客觀描述。

※ 引述《jacklyl (超越大師)》之銘言：
: 剛剛發現有電子版
: 就去買了頂頂大名的屠殺
: 想來看看書中最後定稿到底是怎麼寫
: https://i.imgur.com/MQgf8ov.jpg
: 總共13.64鎂
: 有沒有屠殺的八卦？


(1)這是第一封寄給柯文哲的信
https://i.imgur.com/8VtbATF.jpg

信中附上了第一版草稿
https://i.imgur.com/tlvOeVO.jpg


附上草稿的文字跟我的翻譯(有誤可指正)


Just over a decade ago, a young Taiwanese surgeon began thinking about going
to the mainland to acquire human organs. It wasn’t a pleasant decision; he
thought of himself as a conscientious man, not a gambler. But the waiting
period for a liver or even a kidney in Taiwan could be as long as two or
three years, by which time many of his patients would simply waste away. And
if Chinese hospitals could perform the soup-to-nuts services they claimed on
the web-donor to order, surgery, observation, recovery- patients who could
barely be loaded onto a plane might come back as human beings who had
successfully digested their airline meal, weren’t sure they actually needed
the wheelchair, and tearfully hugged their waiting grandchildren. Taiwan was
a death sentence for these patients: Mainland Chinese hospitals were
blatantly advertising a tissue matched organ within a week or perhaps two.

10多年前，一位年輕的台灣醫師開始想到有關於到中國去獲取人體器官，這並不是一個
愉快的決定；他認為自己是一個有良心的人而非賭徒。但等待肝臟或腎臟的過程在台灣　
可以長達兩年或三年，在這段等待期內許多他的病人生命都被輕易浪費了。而如果中國



He didn’t particularly want to look behind the Mainland curtain that’s all.
You could do anything you liked in China. Cut someone’s dick off if you
liked. Not that much difference from what he was trying to do; it was common
knowledge that the organs were being taken from executed prisoners on death
row.




So if his job was to ride his fragile patients into the wild, wild east and
bring them back alive, okay, but even that wasn’t certain; the criminal
life-style led to a high probability of hepatitis, drug-use, or promiscuous
sex. Labor camp led to stress and malnutrition. Any, or perhaps all, of these
medical histories would now be given a second life in his patients’ bodies.
And there was no recourse if something went wrong, not in a highly
competitive, entrepreneurial business that operated in a not-quite-black
market but a very, very gray one. Nor were his patients in any sense rich.
Taiwan was still an emerging tiger; his patients had lived interesting lives
to be sure, but modest ones. A glance at the web established the foreigner
price of 63,000 US for a kidney. Because Chinese regarded the Taiwanese as
slick foreigners wearing a Chinese mask that would be his price too, and yet
native Chinese were paying half that. This injustice gnawed at him. Somehow,
where so many Taiwanese businessmen before him had failed, he would have to
convince the Mainland doctors he was not a foreign devil but a brother.




The surgeon went to China and meticulously worked through the checklist of
intimacy with his medical colleagues: The go-to-hell banquet. The Karaoke
bar. The cognac followed by the Mao-Tai. The subtle flattery and the jokes
about his accent. And when the ritual was truly finished, the Chinese
surgeons summoned him.




You are one of us. You are a brother. So we will give you the family price.
But we are going to do more for you than that. We’ve noted your worries and
concerns about organ quality. And we trust your discretion. So you will have
no worries for your patients. They will receive nothing but the best: all the
organs will come from Falun Gong. These people may be a little fanatical, but
you know? They don’t drink. They don’t smoke. Many of them are young. They
practice healthy Chi-gong. Very soon your patients --they will be young and
healthy too.




And the surgeon smiled, and thanked them politely, and the process began. But
at the point of victory, he had felt no relief, only something that gnawed at
him worse than before. Something he could not speak of.

然後這名醫師笑了，並且禮貌地道謝，然後這過程就開始了。但在這個勝利的當下，他沒
感到寬慰，只感到有比以前更糟的東西啃食著他，一種他說不出來的東西。


Even as he set up appointments for his patients on the Mainland, the surgeon
kept thinking that there must be a way to rationalize the system, to apply
some oversight, some sort of technical fix. Yet now that the doctors had
blood on their hands there was no obvious way to medical reform. An open
discussion would require dredging up the past. The Party would never allow
the slaughter of prisoners of conscience to be revealed to the world- in fact
his Chinese surgeon friends had already let him know discreetly that the
harvesting of Falun Gong would be put in hold as the Olympics approached.
When it was over- they would do it again. Perhaps the way forward was to use
that brief hiatus as an opening to implement good bureaucratic hygiene,
something to raise the cost of keeping secrets?




There was plenty of talk about consent forms-making the prisoner sign a
release donating his organ to the nation ”as a final penance” or something
like that. But the surgeon knew the labor camp administrators could get
anyone to sigh anything. Reform had to start with the doctors’ conscience.
On his own time, the surgeon labored to create a national database system, a
mandatory electronic form. For every organ acquired, a doctor would have to
fill in details on individual donor health, medical background, blood type,
address, arrest record, everything. The form just had to be simple,
non-threatening, and mainland-user-friendly-something even a barefoot doctor
could use. Maybe he could sell the system to the Chinese medical establishment,
even make some sort of compensation, and yet-that gnaw again- even if the
mainland doctors adopted the system, you would only remove 95% of the problem.
It was sickening.




Anyway, they rejected it. It was obvious in retrospect that it was okay for
the Mainland doctors to run a sort of informal ebay of organ trading, done
through emails, and discrete usergroups, but the surgeon’s forms would
either cut out too many potential donors or leave too much of an electronic
trail. The rejection was passed on with the respect you give to a distant
cousin who doesn’t quite get it. A few years later the surgeon gave an
anonymous interview to an American writer-well, we thought it was anonymous
anyway- and the surgeon was banned from the mainland for life.

無論如何，他們拒絕了。回想起來很明顯，中國的醫師們能用某種非正式的ebay管道作器
官交易，或通過email或是離散的群組完成，但這名醫師的表單要馬會阻斷掉太多的潛在
捐贈者，或是會留下太多的電子紀錄。The rejection was passed on with the respect
you give to a distant cousin who doesn’t quite get it。幾年後這名醫師給一名美
國作家進行了匿名-嗯，至少我們認為是匿名的採訪，無論如何，這名醫師終身被禁止進
入中國。


有幾件事情應該是關於這份草稿的客觀共識：

1.葛特曼此篇文章中只講述一位台灣醫生的故事。
2.這個"台灣醫生"前面用Young Taiwanese surgeon，中用He，最後用The surgeon指稱。
3.雖然用了三種寫法稱呼這個"台灣醫生"，但原文撰寫的流暢，不會讓人誤會。
4.這個台灣醫師文中描述做過以下事情：
        a.為了自己的病人去過中國找器官；
        d.認為系統引進中國可提升醫師良心，先解決95%問題。
5.承上，這點很重要，若葛特曼指的台灣醫師是柯文哲，則葛特曼搞錯了。
6.現實中的柯文哲僅做過b、c、d，柯文哲沒有門診沒有病人，所以不可能做過a。


那再來，是第二封信


(2)第二封信，柯文哲的回信

承上封信件內容後，柯文哲回信如下

「the story seems Ok.
Dr. Wen-je Ko（柯文哲）」


有幾件事情應該是關於這份回覆的客觀共識：

1.柯文哲回覆信件(1)，這故事看起來ok。
2.柯文哲並沒有否認或提醒文中的台灣醫師不是他，
3.柯文哲亦沒有同意或提醒文中的台灣醫生就是他。
3.承上，這點很重要，若葛特曼指的台灣醫師是柯文哲，則柯的回覆可能讓葛誤會柯同意。


接著是第三封信


(3)第三封信，再次寄給柯的信
https://i.imgur.com/dFU0zV5.jpg

詢問當書提到你跟我們講的事情時，是否可用你的名字？
在過去我們提到你時只用「匿名台灣醫生」。

柯文哲並回覆：

「OK
for what I say, I can be responsible」


有幾件事情應該是關於這份回覆的客觀共識：
1.葛特曼的信在指要將Young Taiwanese surgeon、He、The surgeon都換成Dr.Ko。
2.葛特曼的信並沒有明確說是要替換掉Young Taiwanese surgeon、He、The surgeon。
3.但葛特曼的信夠讓人聯想到是要替換掉Young Taiwanese surgeon、He、The surgeon。
4.柯文哲有可能有意識到要替換Young Taiwanese surgeon、He、The surgeon，並同意。
5.柯文哲有可能沒意識到要替換Young Taiwanese surgeon、He、The surgeon，並同意。
6.雙方的來往信件文字，皆不存在明顯的蓄意欺騙或隱藏事實。
7.但雙方的來往信件文字，的確有可能存在認知不同的情況。

最後《屠殺》這本書就出版了。
且最終定稿直至目前為止，
並沒有證據可指出葛特曼有預先給柯文哲看過定稿。

講了那麼多草稿的部分，
接下來我講我在亞馬遜上買的原稿部分，
看看葛特曼修改了什麼，

我用原文上覆蓋上藍字的方式示意。

第一段：
https://imgur.com/uDTr8LZ.jpg

第二段：
https://imgur.com/0SZ3Wcw.jpg
(盜懶覺 Cut someons's dick off可能太低俗了被換字了)

第三段：
https://imgur.com/knTjOt9.jpg

第四段：
https://imgur.com/D5O1Q6c.jpg

第五段：
https://imgur.com/QFwZdYM.jpg
整段文字不變，但全部改斜體字跟加底線，
代表不是Dr.Ko講的，而是其他人說的。

第六段：
https://imgur.com/o4m0KrX.jpg

第七段：
https://imgur.com/bzdj212.jpg

第八段：
https://imgur.com/REsVAfi.jpg

第九段：
https://imgur.com/0hFPuWX.jpg

備註：最後面在A year or so after之前，最終版有多加一句

Dr.Ko was whispering now: "But something should be done. Something should
be done."

然後接之後A year or so after，圖片上塞不下了，所以補在備註。


整份草稿跟最終稿之間差異大概就這樣，
有些小地方可能有出入，因為是用眼睛掃的，但不會差太多

有幾件事情應該是關於這份定稿的客觀共識：
1.葛特曼沒有說到柯文哲是掮客。
2.葛特曼沒有說到柯文哲買賣器官。
3.葛特曼沒有說柯文哲：所有的器官都來自法輪功。
4.承上，2014年葛特曼的說法不算錯，的確不會有英語系國家認為是柯文哲講的。
5.承上，事實上看得懂英文的都不會認為是柯https://imgur.com/fU4jY1c.jpg。
6.承上，但若不看原文，只刻意斷章取義截張圖，是有可能被誤導認為是柯。
7.承上，葛的編排方式責任不大，因存心要誤導還是能有別的方式誤導。
8.葛特曼沒有講到葉克膜。

其中1、2、3點同時也是2014選舉時柯被攻擊的點，也是葛特曼回信澄清的點

書中沒寫柯仲介、
書中沒寫柯是掮客、
書中沒寫柯說所有的器官都來自法輪功。


大概就是醬。

至於葛特曼接受國外訪談或國會作證，
葛說柯文哲為了他的病人去中國找器官

這段就是他書中寫的Young Taiwanese surgeon、He、The surgeon去做的事，
既然後來在上面的溝通中Young Taiwanese surgeon、He、The surgeon換成Dr.Ko，
那葛特曼去英國國會說的話，只是照著書講。


簡單講，
2014對於《屠殺》這本書來說，
問題是攻防在《屠殺》這本書內容有沒有被曲解。
(不論the surgeon是不是柯文哲，書中the surgeon就是沒講所有器官都來自法輪功，)


而2018對於《屠殺》這本書來說，
問題則是在《屠殺》這本書是不是寫錯了，
原因可能是如上述第一、二封信來往過程導致的結果。


但就現在看起來，
柯文哲沒看診，自然沒病人，
沒病人則更不可能去中國為自己病人找器官。

可見《屠殺》這本書寫錯了。

參與在其中的三方
都有一定程度可以被歸責的部分

1.第一、二封信來往間的溝通不清加未確認。
2.葛特曼沒把定稿給柯文哲看。
3.中間人信沒有寫好。

然後借用一下K大的意見。


我認為從這來龍去脈中，
仍能看出柯文哲在醫德上的清白。

但我只是希望能更客觀呈現素材給大家評斷，

在若干年後來回顧時，
結論都是柯的清白無可質疑，
但推導過程可能能更接近真實。


這件事看起來，
現在吵的內容都跟《屠殺》無關了，
因為《屠殺》沒講葉克膜，也沒講合照又怎樣﹒


在847跳進來攪和前，
單就書的內容，
比起政治事件來說，

更像是一個職場事件，
提醒我們傳訊息寫email要交代清楚，
然後要確認對方知道你在講什麼，

否則會害你辛苦工作多年的人權書成果，
變成一本可信度有問題的書籍，

值得各位上班族鄉民們引以為戒。

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 39.8.222.20
※ 文章代碼(AID): #1RkDRRvN (Gossiping)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1538840283.A.E57.html