---

As I wrote on FTR FB earlier, yesterday I missed the QA, because there was
nothing to translate.

　昨天沒有發Q&A是因為沒啥可說的

If you want, Overlord is collecting feedback on World of Warplanes – how do
you like it?

　Overlord 正在收集 WoWp 的玩家反應


- SerB is fine with the performance of old premium/reward tanks, such as the
Ram II, Matilda LL, T14, A32 and Panzer S35

　SerB對那些出了很久的金幣/活動車輛的表現感到滿意，像是Ram II、Matilda LL、T14
、A32 和 Panzer S35

- spall liner will have no effect, if a HE shell splash (or blast itself)
hits a zone, where there is no armor (like on the open-topped new German 　TD
’s) – SerB states that it reduces damage proportionally to armor and when
the armor is 0, the reduction is also 0 – spall liner doesn’t reduce the
damage of complete penetrations (SS: BUT the improved saving throw for crew
will still work)




- camo factor of the WT E-100 and RhB WT won’t be commented on (SS: a player
asked whether WT E-100 has worse armor than Maus)

　不討論 WT E-100 和 RhB WT 隱蔽值的問題（SS: 有人在問 WT E-100 的裝甲是不是比
Maus 的還低）

- apparently the frequency of server checks (synch of client and server) is
0,1s on average

　伺服端和客戶端同步的頻率平均是0.1秒
（譯：就算平均是0.1s，該掉封包狂lag的還是逃不掉啊…）

- actually, a gun module apparently consists of two modules: an internal part
and the external part (SS: that means the breech of the gun has 0 armor and
is subjected to saving throws only, which means guns with a HUGE breech, like
the Sturer Emil, can get its gun damaged even by being hit on the side armor

　主砲的模組是由兩部份組成：內部（砲膛）和外部（砲管）模組（SS: 砲膛沒有裝甲值
只能靠免傷機制，這表示像 Sturer Emil 這樣砲膛很大的車就算側面中彈也會壞砲）
（譯：上圖最清楚http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/breech.jpg）

- SerB states that the developers never planned to introduce +/-1 MM spread,
because it’s not needed – for example in such a case the T-34/76 couldn’t
face the Tiger

　SerB 表示開發人員從沒打算引進±1分房，因為根本沒必要。舉例來說 T-34/76 碰不到
虎式

- for now there are no details on the transfer of E-50 to tier 10, SerB
states it is just one of the ideas

　目前沒有「把 E-50 提到十階」的進一部消息，SerB 說那只是個想法。

- penetrating the tank wrecks with partial penetration loss will not come in
forseeable future

　可預見的未來內不會實裝讓殘骸可以被打穿的系統
（譯：靠殘骸藏下體賣頭的車安啦）

- there is a separate collision model for a live tank and separate
(simplified) model for a wreck

　還活著的戰車有分離的碰撞模組，殘骸的分離模組是簡化過的。

- Q: “We’ve seen Yuri Pasholok’s post on the 88mm L/71 autoloader, will we
see it in Jagdpanther and King Tiger?” A: “It won’t fit in KT” (SS: its
implementation into Jagdpanther is thus not excluded)

　問：「長88的自動填彈機會出現在獵豹和虎王上嗎？」答：「塞不進虎王裡。」（SS:
沒說不會裝在獵豹上呦～）

- tank hulls (both life tanks and wrecks) do not serve as a visibility
obstacle (SS: a huge stone will block spotchecks, a tank won’t) – this rule
however doesn’t apparently apply on the “object” wrecks, that are a part
of the map (SS: for example the burning Malinovka Panther near northern base)
– these do count as obstacles

　車體不會遮蔽視線判定，不管是活著還是殘骸。但是在地圖上做成戰車殘骸狀的障礙物
件不適用這規則（SS: 例如 Malinovka 北方基地旁的豹式殘骸）

PS: WG EU really did it! Fail hattrick this Friday – if you open WoT
launcher and click on the TRIPLE EXPERIENCE FOR THE FIRST VICTORY – you won’
t end on WoT page, you’ll end up on World of Warplanes portal. How terrible.

　PS: WG EU 真的這樣搞了！如果打開 WoT launcher 點「首勝三倍經驗」超連結，不會
到 WoT 頁面，而會進入 WoWp 的入口網站——失敗的耍人把戲；好貼蘿蔔…


原文：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/22/22-11-2013/

--
        In church, they say to forgive!



--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.160.166.14
※ 編輯: WillieHuang     來自: 118.160.166.14       (11/23 03:19)

--