---

今日跟風YA事件...就身在新竹114感覺好抖...

結果錯過黃金時間來翻譯了 囧


前面WG IIRC的首席製作人公布新的Master of Orion銀河霸主開始開發


- Q: “Why does T-44-85 have such a low penetration?” A: “So you
  don't play it”

  Q：「為什麼T-44-85穿深這麼低？」 A：「為的是不讓你去玩它阿。」

- Q: “When the Allies captured the entire German archives, was
  there ever a case when the Allies had a look at the German
  solutions and were like 'that's genius, we'll do that too'?"
  A: “Yea, the entire French branch.”(later SerB states that
  practically all post-war French tanks are based on German
  drawings)




- one of the reasons for the optional unlockable hull solution is
  the introduction of a number of vehicles into the game, that
  didn't make it for some various reasons (for example something
  else was occupying their tier already, too few modules etc.)



- T-35 will apparently not be a part of a regular branch, it’s too
  weak for tier 4 too

  T-35明顯不會塞進一般線裏頭，它對四階來說也太弱。

- T58 (Heavy) apparently won’t be introduced, despite the German
  150mm autoloader TD making it to the game: "It has armor,
  Germans don't."

  儘管我們做出了新德軍TD線，T58HT還是不會放進遊戲裡。「因為T58HT有
  裝甲，德國新TD沒有。」

- SerB states that buffing viewrange of all tier 4 open-topped tank
  destroyers to 390m would not be “more logical” than current
  situation (SS: a player whines that Marder 38T has too weak
  viewrange)

  SerB表示將所有四階開頂TD的視野BUFF到390m不會比現在的做法更合邏輯。
  （SS：有個玩家在哭說馬德38T太瞎）

- there are differences between 112 and 113 hulls

  中國坦112和113的裝甲有一些不同處。（這問題想問啥？）

- SerB already has the T-44-85

  SerB早就有T-44-85囉，很棒吧！

- apparently, this year, only 0.8.9 and possible 0.9.0 patches
  come out

  目前來看，今年確定會出8.9，9.0有可能。

- PzSfl.V is not called "Sturer Emil" in game, because it was
  simply a nickname, equal to the SU-76 being called "bare-ass
  Ferdinand" in Russian

  PzSfl.V不叫做Sturer Emil的原因是因為那只是個暱稱，就像SU-76在蘇
  聯管它叫做「屁股吹風的肥迪」一樣

- apparently, same case applies for Marder 3, but not Ferdinand,
  which was official (SS: I am pretty sure Marder III was an
  official designation at some point, will re-check)



- premium Marder 3 SdKfz 139? “If necessery”

  Marder III配上擄獲的蘇聯76.2mm砲作為金幣車？「必要的話。」

- the IS-3 driver's viewport is apparently modelled correctly
  in game (SS: some player was complaining that when it was tilted
  like this, the driver would see only the ground)

  IS-3駕駛的潛望口做的很正確。（SS：有人抱怨那玩意做這麼斜，只能看
  地板吧？）

- it's possible T-44 will get another alternative turret, the
  T-44-100

  T-44可能會有T-44-100砲塔可以選擇。

- WT E-100 gonna get a nerf compared to current situation?
  "If necessery"

  WT E-100會削弱嗎？「必要的話。」

- the German vehicles in game have the Balkenkreuz and not
  Swastika, because it’s banned in Germany and WoT is active
  on German market

  德軍車在遊戲中漆上鐵十字而不是納粹標誌，是因為在德國納粹標誌是違
  法的，我們在德國生意做的很大啊！

- there will be no changes to Object 140 in 8.9

  下個版本Object. 140不會改。

- the tank hit decals (SS: those texture “holes”) disappearing
  when new ones are created won’t be changed for now

  坦克表面上遭擊中的貼圖（SS：我們管它叫做洞）會因為新的擊中貼圖而
  消失目前不會改。

Also, Storm made a post, where he asks players their opinion on 8.9 – some
answers from it:

Storm也在詢問玩家對於8.9的意見時回應一些貼文：


- it’s too early to tell what exactly will be in 0.9.0

  這時候談9.0會變成啥模樣還太早。

- devs will keep an eye on the T-44-85 stats, its possible that
  the vehicle could get special limited MM (it would not meet
  tier 8 or 9 tanks), but for now it’s too early to tell

  開發組會密切注意T-44-85的數據，有可能它會有特殊的分房（不會遇到
  八、九階車），但是現在說這還太早。

- a half of players writing on the reload timer wants bigger
  numbers and a half wants smaller, for now it will stay as it is

  一半玩家說裝填時間的字體大小要大點，一半要小點，那就維持原樣吧。
  （譯：我不確定是不是指字體大小）

- it will be possible to choose a map in the next 7/42 battles
  version

  下個版本的7/42團隊戰鬥可能可以選地圖。

- Storm will balance the 7/42 tank profitability (how much credits
  a tank makes) based on statistics, he wants the same
  profitability as in random battles

  Strom會根據統計數據平衡7/42團戰的收益值，它想要讓他能和隨機戰鬥
  賺到的一樣多。

- driver's hatch on IS-3 is 60mm, it’s historical (“the thickness
  of the plate from which it is cut”), it is not supposed to be
  110mm as some players state – apparently there are some
  schematics floating around that are incorrect

  IS-3的駕駛艙蓋在歷史上是60mm（從切下來的板子測量得知），而不是有
  些玩家聲稱的110mm，顯然有些流傳的圖紙紀錄是錯誤的。

- ST-I model (armor slope) is correct, WG specifically checked

  ST-I的模型（裝甲角度）沒問題，我們特別檢查過了。

- apparently WG hired new sound department, they are testing,
  the old records taken at army training grounds will be used

  WG雇了新的音效部門，他們正在測試一些東西。而一些從陸軍教練場錄下
　的舊紀錄會用。


一個小時...還算翻的蠻快的...(倒地

「和SerB有約」的翻譯我再找時間翻吧...

原文網址：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/14/14-10-2013/

--

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.251.230.225

感謝更正 orz 明天早九好像有自虐傾向阿...(苦笑


這真是...YA

※ 編輯: tai33ru         來自: 111.251.230.225      (10/15 04:59)

--