---

- it’s technically possible to make a 1200*1200m WoT map
技術上製作1200*1200m大小的地圖是可行的

- Storm states that it’s not necessery to add the AAMG to some tanks, but it
’s pretty (SS: as in that pintle-mounted MG, that isn’t a part of collision
model anyway)
Storm表示幫戰車製作防空機槍模型並非必要，不過防空機槍好帥啊。
(SS：就是那些裝在桿式槍架上的機槍，總之沒有命中判定)
（譯註：像IS-7或是IS-6砲塔頂部的機槍）

- it’s completely possible that when tank overturning is implemented, a
tank, going down hill full speed will roll on its back if it gets detracked
by intertia
當戰車翻車機制引入後，戰車如果全速衝下山又因為慣性斷履帶，那整台車翻過來是
完全有可能的

- for now there are no plans for more TD’s with more alpha than Jpz E-100
暫時不打算引入更多比JPE100更大管的TD
(大致可以解讀為FV4005短期內不會出現)

- for now, it’s not planned to delete inactive accounts, that are “blocking
” attractive names, as there are difficulties connected with that
不打算把佔著ID不玩遊戲的非活躍帳號刪掉，因為有相關的困難處。

- MM weight of vehicles will not be officially disclosed
車輛分房權重不會由官方公開。


- the 60mm frontal armor T-34 variant (intended as the hull option for T-34)
is not the Leningrad “s ekranami” variant (with spaced armor), the 60mm
plate is apparently homogenous
擁有60mm前裝甲的T-34次型號(設定上是T-34未來的車體研發選項)並不是列寧格勒生產的
s ekranami型(裝了間隙裝甲的版本)，而是60mm均質鋼板。
http://tankarchives.blogspot.tw/2013/08/s-ekranami.html

http://tankarchives.blogspot.ca/2013/05/research-into-soviet-armour-protection
html
延伸閱讀。


- optional hull variants with spaced armor will be kept separate from turrets
with spaced armor apparently (SS: as in, there will be an option to install
only the hull with spaced armor, while the spaced armor on the turret (where
possible) might appear either as equipment, or as a separate turret module)
車體與砲塔的間隙裝甲研發選項會是分開的。
(SS：也就是說未來可以選擇只在車體上加掛間隙裝甲，而砲塔的間隙裝甲可能以研發選項
或是裝備的形式出現)

- SerB states that he doesn’t consider earlier-implemented vehicles to be
obsolete by the fact WG implemented newer high alpha vehicles
SerB表示即使WG引入新的高alpha車種，比較早推出的車並不會因此而顯得過時沒有競爭力


- T-34-2 is worse than Type 59? “Don’t play T-34-2〃
T-34-2比59式差？
「不爽不要開」

- the gold ammo for credits statistics are “fine”, which also means WG won’
t be limiting this in high tiers (SS: some player was whining that too many
people shoot gold on tier 10)
金彈銀買的數據表現良好，這也表示WG不會在高階金彈銀買上追加任何限制。
(SS：某些玩家在抱怨太多人在TX場打金彈)

- NPC tanks won’t be introduced to WoT, as it is much complicated to make AI
tanks than AI planes (like in WoWp)
NPC戰車不會引入，因為戰車的自動駕駛系統比戰機難做太多。

- SerB states that this MM is normal
SerB覺得這個分房沒什麼問題
http://cs313519.vk.me/v313519808/50da/-RKAenKgNVY.jpg

- Q: “Will there be a post-battle player performance rating by other
players, something like the reputation on forums?” A: “‘I WILL NEGREP YOU
YOU CAMPING BUSH-LOVING WANKER!!111!!’ yea right…”
「會追加功能讓玩家在戰鬥之後給予其他玩家評價，像是論壇上的評價系統嗎？
「『我要給你負評，你這個龜樹叢的爛貨啊哈哈哈』，聽起來真棒...」

- Japanese planes in WoWp being fragile is an intended feature
WoP日本飛機像是紙糊的是故意設計的國家特徵。

- T-34-3 price is fine
T-34-3的價錢沒問題




http://ppt.cc/~Z1k
額外資訊：WoWS，日本帝國海軍高雄級重巡洋艦。
順手翻一翻好了，不過翻譯品質比較沒保證。

The construction of the heavy cruiser Takao, along with the other same class
ships (Atago, Chōkai, Maya), was initially considered as a modernized and
improved sequel of the successful Myōkō-class vessels.
重巡洋艦高雄與其姊妹艦──愛宕、鳥海、摩耶被認定是妙高級重巡的現代化改良版本。


This new ship not only was an upgraded version of her predecessor, but also
carried significant additions like strengthened belt armor, a swivel-mounted
3 barrel torpedo launchers, hull made out of Ducol steel and 3 seaplanes
aboard. Realization of the vast majority of these innovations was
accomplished thanks to mediation of Vice Admiral Yuzuru Hiraga who was head
of the project in its early stages. He learned about these improvements from
his friend – veteran shipbuilder Eustace Tennyson d'Eyncourt when during one
of their conversations they touched on contemporary British battleships.
Hiraga decided to keep up with British constructors.

創新設計得以實裝必須歸功於造艦計畫的領導者──海軍技術中將平賀讓。平賀在與好友

──英國資深船艦設計師尤斯塔斯‧田尼森‧德－埃文科從男爵談論當代英國戰艦時得知
這些改良方案，從而決定與英國造艦者採取一致步調。


(譯註：原文似乎搞錯了什麼，高雄竣工時裝的魚雷管是4座雙聯裝，42年改裝為4座四聯裝
，應該沒有搭載三聯裝魚雷發射管的紀錄)


>From the technical point of view Takao was quite close to excellence, though
at the same time her name was rather simple (same applies for her sister
ships). Takao, Chōkai, Maya and Atago traditionally got their names after 4
Japanese mountains. It’s worth mentioning that “Takao” was quite popular
among the navy - 3 other ships (all decommissioned and scrapped by that time)
were named exactly the same way.
從技術觀點上，高雄頗為優秀。而她的命名方式則頗簡單，高雄、鳥海、摩耶、愛宕的艦
名來自日本四座山岳。同時，「高雄」這個名字在日本海軍中頗受歡迎，有三艘軍艦（
在高雄級服役時已經全數退役解體）曾以相同的名稱命名。


Takao was commissioned in 1932 and during her service experienced three
modernizations of equipment; several times she was badly damaged. Takao also
participated in the Battle of Leyte Gulf, where she was hit by torpedoes from
submarine USS Darter.
重巡洋艦高雄於1932年進入服役序列，曾經經歷三次現代化改裝與數次嚴重受損。
高雄參加了萊特灣海戰，於戰役中被美軍潛艇Darter發射的魚雷擊中大破。

(譯註：美軍二戰潛艇多以魚類名稱命名，不過我沒查到Darter中文該怎麼翻...)

The last place of her service was Seletar Harbor (Singapore) where together
with “older sister” Myōkō she was moored as floating AA batteries. The
Royal Navy looking for revenge after several rather embarrassing defeats
developed a sophisticated sabotage operation to sank both of them - midget
submarine HMS XE3 sneaked under ship's keel and placed there 6 limpet mines
that when set off would detonate 4 tons of explosives located at the bottom
of the ship. The explosion caused a huge breach in the ship's hull partially
sinking it, thus Takao never sailed again.
高雄的最終任務是在新加坡的實里達港，與學姊艦妙高共同擔任水上防空砲台工作。
英國皇家海軍在數次受挫之後為了找回面子而策劃了緻密的破壞行動以除去這兩艘重巡
──微型潛艇XE3摸到高雄的龍骨正下方且安裝了六枚帽貝狀水雷，啟動時高雄船底的
四噸炸藥將會被引爆。這次爆破在船體上炸出一個大洞，同時讓艦體部分浸水。自此之後
高雄再也沒有出海。


--
Tier1 似乎很好玩的樣子...           Tier7  你能面對白板車嗎？
Tier2 新主砲真是太令人高興了　　    Tier8  把組員賣掉的我，真是個笨蛋
Tier3 已經沒什麼好研發的了　　　　　Tier9  那樣的前置變速箱，我絕不允許
Tier4 死組員、壞零件，都是存在的    Tier10 再也不依靠隊友
Tier5 怎麼可能會爆彈藥架            Tier11 最後留下的科技樹
Tier6 燒兩次車絕對很奇怪啊          Tier12 我最好的開發商(WG)

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.115.106.32
※ 編輯: hsinhanchu      來自: 59.115.106.32        (09/29 01:51)
※ 編輯: hsinhanchu      來自: 59.115.106.32        (09/29 01:57)

--