---

1.新聞網址︰
※ 網址超過一行 請縮網址 ※
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/3363750

2.新聞來源︰

自由

3.完整新聞標題
※ 請完整轉載標題 請勿修改與編排 ※
美總務署長墨菲致函拜登全文 強調「不代表認證勝選者」



4.完整新聞內容︰
※ 請完整轉載原文 請勿修改內文與編排 ※
首次上稿 11-26 23:43
更新時間 11-27 05:55



親愛的拜登先生：







然而不幸的是，《總統交接法案》並沒有為總統交接制定程序或標準，因此我參考過去的選
舉中，所涉及法律質疑和不完整計票的事件尋找先例；

GSA不會判定法律爭議與重新計票的結果，
也不會判定這類的法律訴訟是否合理與正當，

這些問題應是由美國憲法、聯邦法律和州法，移交給選票認證程序以及具有管轄權的法院去
判決，我認為負責改善聯邦採購與財產管理的機構，

不應將自身置於憲法所規範的選舉程序之上；

我強烈敦促國會考慮對《總統交接法》進行修正。





如果還需要任何幫助，請聯繫聯邦交接協調專員瑪麗· 吉爾伯特女士（Ms. Mary D. Gibert
）。

謹上

艾蜜莉· W· 墨菲

署長

美國總務署

November 23, 2020

The Honorable Joseph R. Biden, Jr.

1401 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20230

Dear Mr. Biden:

As the Administrator of the U.S. General Services Administration, I have the abi
lity under the Presidential Transition Act of 1963, as amended, to make certain
post-election resources and services available to assist in the event of a presi
dential transition. See 3 U.S.C. §  102 note （the "Act"）. I take this role ser
iously and, because of recent developments involving legal challenges and certif
ications of election results, am transmitting this letter today to make those re
sources and services available to you.

I have dedicated much of my adult life to public service, and I have always stri
ved to do what is right. Please know that I came to my decision independently, b
ased on the law and available facts. I was never directly or indirectly pressure
d by any Executive Branch official—including those who work at the White House
or GSA—with regard to the substance or timing of my decision.To be clear, I did
 not receive any direction to delay my determination. I did, however, receive th
reats online, by phone, and by mail directed at my safety, my family, my staff,
and even my pets in an effort to coerce me into making this determination premat
urely. Even in the face of thousands of threats, I always remained committed to
upholding the law.

Contrary to media reports and insinuations, my decision was not made out of fear
 or favoritism. Instead, I strongly believe that the statute requires that the G
SA Administrator ascertain, not impose, the apparent president-elect. Unfortunat
ely, the statute provides no procedures or standards for this process, so I look
ed to precedent from prior elections involving legal challenges and incomplete c
ounts. GSA does not dictate the outcome of legal disputes and recounts, nor does
 it determine whether such proceedings are reasonable or justified. These are is
sues that the Constitution, federal laws, and state laws leave to the election c
ertification process and decisions by courts of competent jurisdiction. I do not
 think that an agency charged with improving federal procurement and property ma
nagement should place itself above the constitutionally-based election process.
I strongly urge Congress to consider amendments to the Act.

As you know, the GSA Administrator does not pick or certify the winner of a pres
idential election. Instead, the GSA Administrator’s role under the Act is extre
mely narrow: to make resources and services available in connection with a presi
dential transition. As stated, because of recent developments involving legal ch
allenges and certifications of election results, I have determined that you may
access the post-election resources and services described in Section 3 of the Ac
t upon request. The actual winner of the presidential election will be determine
d by the electoral process detailed in the Constitution.

Section 7 of the Act and Public Law 116-159, dated October 1, 2020, which provid
es continuing appropriations until December 11, 2020, makes $6,300,000 available
 to you to carry out the provisions of Section 3 of the Act. In addition, $1,000
,000 is authorized, pursuant to Public Law 116-159, to provide appointee orienta
tion sessions and a transition directory. I remind you that Section 6 of the Act
 imposes reporting requirements on you as a condition for receiving services and
 funds from GSA.

If there is anything we can do to assist you, please contact Ms. Mary D. Gibert,
 the Federal Transition Coordinator.

Sincerely,

Emily W. Murphy

Administrator

U.S. General Services Administration



5.附註、心得、想法︰
※ 40字心得、備註 ※
掰登：幹！你為啥不先講

就說三普不是省油的燈的

這些問題應是由美國憲法、聯邦法律和州法，
移交給選票認證程序以及具有管轄權的法院去判決


--
╬信基督得美國大魔王╬


--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.139.94.177 (臺灣)
※ 文章代碼(AID): #1Vm2X70s (HatePolitics)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1606428743.A.036.html