---

中文翻譯來源：中央社
https://bit.ly/2QwlYZN

英文原文：Taipei Times
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2019/01/09/2003707590

網頁版：
https://hackmd.io/s/SySZ2TfMV

https://i.imgur.com/xEgEpFB.png


Open letter to democratic Taiwan

We the undersigned scholars, former government and military officials,
and other friends of Taiwan who have witnessed and admired Taiwan's
transition to democracy for many decades wish to express to the people
of Taiwan our sense of urgency to maintain unity and continuity at this
critical moment in Taiwan's history.

It is obvious that during the past two years, the People's Republic of
China
has left no stone unturned in its attempts to squeeze Taiwan's
international space, threaten it with a buildup of military power and
make it appear as if Taiwan's only future lies in integration with an
authoritarian China.

This pressure culminated on Wednesday last week with a speech by Chinese
President and Chinese Communist Party General Secretary Xi Jinping
(習近平), telling the Taiwanese people that "the Taiwan question" was a
Chinese internal affair, that unification under China's "one country,
two systems" principle was the only option for the future and Taiwan
independence was a "dead end."

In her response the same day, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized
that the vast majority of the Taiwanese people strongly rejected "one
country, two systems" and that her government had never accepted the
so-called "1992 consensus."

She then reiterated her "Taiwan consensus" based on the "four musts,"
elaborated in her New Year’s address the day before. These include
that China must accept the reality of the existence of the Republic
of China (Taiwan), and respect the commitment of the 23 million people
of Taiwan to freedom and democracy.

As international scholars, writers and former officials we believe
this is the right response. It is also illustrative of the stable and
responsible leadership Tsai has displayed in the face of the mounting
threat from communist China.

We applaud the courageous stance of the Taiwanese people in resisting
Chinese pressures and protecting their own democratic system.

However, we express our concerns that Beijing’s latest subversive
techniques of deception and disinformation could sow division and
confusion in Taiwan's body politic and create the kind of civil unrest
that Beijing lists as one of the pretexts for using force against Taiwan
 — which would nevertheless constitute aggression in violation of the
UN Charter.

In our view, Tsai is a most effective and knowledgeable statesperson.
With her quiet demeanor and careful balancing she has not only
significantly advanced Taiwan’s place in the international community,
and elevated Taiwan's profile on the international radar screen, but
also stood firm in defending Taiwan's hard-won freedom and democracy.

Just as Taiwan has made itself a democratic model for the region, Tsai
has earned the respect of other nations for her courageous and composed
response to the aggressive bullying of Taiwan’s powerful neighbor. We
urge our own governments to make clear to Beijing that Taiwan does not
stand alone.

Taiwan is at a crossroads as never before. It is under an existential
threat by the People's Republic of China. While we respect the reality
that Taiwan, like all democratic polities, has a range of domestic issues
that must be resolved, that democratic process should proceed in a manner
that does not detract from the overall national unity in the face of the
larger threat to Taiwan's existence as a free and democratic nation.

If Taiwanese across the political spectrum fail to understand this
threat, and go on with business as usual, this provides Beijing's
repressive leaders with an opportunity to divide Taiwanese society
and increasingly make it an inevitability that Taiwan is incorporated
into China.

This happened with East Turkestan in 1949, Tibet in 1950 to 1951, and
Hong Kong in 1997. The repression and lack of freedom and democracy
there should serve as a wake-up call for Taiwan.

We thus appeal to the people of Taiwan to maintain a clear vision for
their future as a free and democratic nation that is a full and equal
member in the international family of nations. The process may be slow
and cumbersome, but it is essential to maintain unity and to be supportive
of a democratically elected president who has demonstrated balance,
flexibility and toughness.

These are the qualities Taiwan needs to navigate the stormy seas ahead
towards a brighter and more secure future.


國際學者給台灣人民的公開信

享有民主的台灣人民加油！



很顯然的，在過去兩年，中華人民共和國不擇手段試圖壓縮台灣的國際空間，以
擴充其軍力作為威脅，要造成台灣的未來只有納入威權體制之中國的印象。





作為國際學者、作家及前政府官員，我們深信這是正確的反應。如此反應也顯示
出蔡總統在面對共產中國日增的威脅下，所展現的穩健與盡責的領導能力。












出的總統。蔡總統已展現持平、彈性和堅定的風格，台灣正是需要這種領袖特質，

以渡過風浪，航向更光明與安全的未來。


John J. Tkacik, International Assessment and Strategy Center, retired US
foreign service officer, Alexandria, Virginia

Clive Ansley, international lawyer, Courtenay, British Columbia

Thomas Bartlett, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Joseph A. Bosco, Georgetown University (retired), formerly at the office of
the secretary of defense, US Department of Defense, Washington

Kevin Carrico, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Frank Chiang, Fordham University Law School, New York

Peter Chow, City University of New York, New York

Jerome A. Cohen, New York University Law School, New York

Michael Danielsen, Taiwan Corner, Copenhagen, Denmark

June Teufel Dreyer, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida

Feng Chongyi, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

Carl Ford, former US assistant secretary of state, National Park University,
Park, Arkansas

Brock Freeman, American Citizens for Taiwan, Seattle, Washington

Michael Rand Hoare, School of Oriental and African Studies, London

Thomas G. Hughes, former chief of staff to the late US senator Claiborne
Pell, Washington

Michael A. Hunzeker, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia

J. Bruce Jacobs, professor emeritus of Asian Languages and Studies, Monash
University, Melbourne, Australia

Paul Jobin, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, and University of Paris Diderot, France

Richard C. Kagan, professor emeritus, Hamline University, St Paul, Minnesota

Michael Y.M. Kau, professor emeritus, Brown University, Providence, Rhode
Island

Bruno Kaufmann, European Democracy Foundation, Switzerland

Sasa Istenic Kotar, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

Paul Kovenock, US Department of State (retired), Washington

Andre Laliberte, University of Ottawa, Canada

Perry Link, professor emeritus of East Asian studies, Princeton University,
New Jersey

Victor H. Mair, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

The Very Reverend Dr Bruce McLeod, former moderator, United Church of Canada

Wayne Pajunen, writer and former legislative aide, House of Commons, Ottawa

Timothy S. Rich, Western Kentucky University, Kentucky

Shawna Yang Ryan, University of Hawaii, Manoa, Hawaii

Michael Scanlon, Shih Chien University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

David C. Schak, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia

James D. Seymour, Columbia University, New York City

Fang-long Shih, London School of Economics and Political Science, London

Michael Stainton, Taiwanese Human Rights Association of Canada, Toronto,
Canada

William A. Stanton, former director of the American Institute in Taiwan,
Taipei

Peter Tague, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington

Ross Terrill, Fairbank Center Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Arthur Waldron, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Gerrit van der Wees, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia

Jack F. Williams, professor emeritus, Michigan State University, East
Lansing, Michigan

Yenna Wu, University of California, Riverside, California

Ambassador Stephen M. Young, US department of state (retired), Londonderry,
New Hampshire

Gordon G. Chang, author of The Coming Collapse of China, New Jersey.

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.125.179.203
※ 文章代碼(AID): #1SDLQWEz (Gossiping)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1546999456.A.3BD.html